WHAT WITH MODEL CAR RACING IN A POST-JPVR ERA?

Can we combine FIA GT Racing with LMS Racing in a double 2009 EEC?

THIS ARTICLE SHOULD BE A TOPIC OF DEMOCRATIC REFLEXION. SEND YOUR VIEW UPON IT TO jppro@pandora.be !

May 7, 2008 - My major concern is what'll happen with IMCA next year, when I am no longer there. For the Worlds there will be no problem. My successor Mark Campbell has anything under control for the 2009 Toronto Worlds. But what with the EEC 2009? The EEC must be continued, but not in such a way that only one person is responsible for anything. I try to compile some basic principles.

MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CARS
A total of 24 cars is too much. We should limit the entrance to 16 cars (both in FIA GT as in LMS) with never less than 2 drivers per car, never more than 3 drivers per car. In FIA GT I propose 8 GT1 cars and 8 GT2 cars (with separate standings), in LMS  8 LMP1 cars (now: P1) and 8 LMP2 cars (now P2), but without separate standings. GT1, res. LMP1 cars should in principle go to teams with at last one racer with more than 50 IOC-points; GT2 cars, res. LMP2 cars, should go to teams with two racers having both collected less than 50 IOC-points.

NUMBER OF ROUNDS
In FIA GT racing number of rounds can be restricted to 3 per year, in LMS racing to 5 per year. Racers can enter only the FIA GT races or only the LMS races, but are allowed to enter both series. The LMS races should be scheduled on Saturday, the FIA GT races on Sunday. There should thus be 3 "double" meetings (Saturday and Sunday) and 2 "single meetings" (only on Saturday).

DURATION OF EACH ROUND
Each round should be limited to 2 heats of 8 x 30 minutes (4 hours of non-interrupted racing per car). To avoid that racers should already be in place on Friday (LMS) or Saturday (FIA GT) time schedule should be restricted. Doors open at noon on raceday, 2 hours of free practice, 1 hour for scrutineering and 9 hours for 2 heats. So each round can be closed at mid-night allowing racers to be home in time.

WHICH TRACKS?
If one wishes to limit the complete duration of a round to 12 hours one has to race with 16 cars on 8-laner tracks. Number of wooden 8-laners in Europe is restricted as can be seen in the right column. Based upon the 132 entries at the 3 FIA GT rounds of the EEC 2008 Germany was good for 23 % of the entries, Norway for 20 %, Belgium for 14 % [Holland for 14 %, Denmark for 10 %, etc]. The logic of the situation is thus that the 3 FIA GT rounds are contested in Germany, Norway and Belgium. Those should be "double rounds" with a FIA GT race on Sunday, a LMS race on Saturday. The two remaining LMS rounds - now "single rounds" should go to Holland and Denmark.

 

ABOUT THE CONCRETE LOCATIONS
(1) GERMANY - Here we have the following wooden 8-laners:
     
l Aachen (Aachener Carrera Rennbahn Center) - They have a 27m wooden 8-laner
     
l Brühl (Blue King Club ) - They have a 48m Steve Ogilvie banked wooden Blue King
     
l Darmstadt (Renncenter Rhein-Main und FNS Darmstadt) - They have a 27m wooden 8-laner
     
l Minden (Blue King Minden) - They have a 51m wooden 8-laner, a flat King
(2) NORWAY - They have only two wooden 8-laners
     
l Asker-Oslo (Asker Blue King) - They have a 48m Egil Aksnes banked wooden Blue King
     
l Trondheim (Trondheim MTT) - They are building a 42m wooden MTT track. Not ready by now.
(3) BELGIUM - There are 5 wooden 8-laners
     
l Herentals (IMCA MTT Club) - They have a 42m brand new wooden MTT 8-laner
     
l Diepenbeek (Speedlines) - They have a 27m wooden PDS 8-laner in a horrible location
     
l Wezembeek-Oppem (Merlijn) - They have a 40m wooden Heerwegh 8-laner (not permanent)
     
l Nieuwpoort (Op Zolder) - They have a 33m very old 8-laner in an impossible location
     
l Dison (Colson's) - They have a 32m wooden ex-Demoget 8-laner in a strange location
(4) HOLLAND - They have one or two wooden 8-laners
     
l Uden (M.R.T.U.) - They have a 48m banked wooden Blue King of own construction
     
l Sint-Anna-Kapelle (?) - They have (perhaps) a wooden 8-laner (more info T.B.A.)
(5) DENMARK - They have at least two wooden 8-laners
     
l Roedovre-Copenhagen (Racefun.dk) - They have an ex-Schietekat wooden 8-laner
     
l Copenhagen (Martin Borch) - He has a private King-style wooden !-laner.

For the moment Asker-Oslo (N), Roedovre-Copenhagen (DK), Minden (D), Uden (NL) and Herentals (B) seem the best locations. However, then we have two rounds on a banked King. By replacing Asker by Trondheim (if their MTT track will be ready around Easter 2009) there should only be one banked King. Minden can be replaced by Darmstadt (if Kurt Petri agrees). Keld Høfler of Racefun.dk was not enthusiast for commercial reasons. Perhaps we should better explain the whole proposal. Alsdorf or Aachen could be alternatives for Minden or Frankfurt, but then the combination of FIA GT with LMS on one week-end seems impossible, since Alsdorf has only 6 lanes.

ABOUT THE RACERS
Once the five locations and five concrete week-ends are fixed we could allow the racers to subscribe. Racers with the most IOC-points should then have the first choice of their car, racers with the lowest IOC-points the last choice. Racers should be asked if they wish to combine FIA GT with LMS or if they prefer to enter only one of both series. There should thus be 2 European Championships, one for FIA GT cars with res. 10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1 points for the top-8 in both classes (GT1 and GT2) and 20-15-12-10-8-6-4-3-2-1 points for the top-10 scratch for LMS cars.

 

ABOUT THE RACE DIRECTION
Their should be an independent IMCA race direction under the lead of Jean-Marie Tillén at all rounds of both FIA GT 1/24 and LMS 1/24. Tillen should make a choice of his assistant(s) among persons not involved in one of the rounds. He's also responsible for the publication of the results and the standings.

ABOUT THE RESPONSIBLE PERSONS PER ROUND
The EEC 2008 - all 3 the rounds - went under the responsibility of one single person (having made himself the technical rules). Despite his unlimited enthusiasm and excellent work - especially for the round at Alsdorf on his beloved track - it was a wrong decision. Rule making, technical control, race direction and organising may absolutely not be centralised in one hand. A better system is to place the two series (FIA GT and LMS) under co-ordination & supervision of the IMCA race director. Responsible persons per round should be the owners of the five selected race tracks [e.g. Egil Aksnes for Asker, Keld Høfler and Gorm Nørmgaard for Roedovre, Gerald Barg for Minden, JPVR for Herentals and the MRTU for Uden - should that be the 5 selected tracks].

ABOUT THE SELECTION OF 16 CARS
Both for the FIA GT as for the LMS I propose to drive 1/24th model car versions. The selection process is the same I use since 1984. I consider the results obtained by each car at the qualifications and at the finish, giving the top-10 in both rankings 20, 15, 12, 10, 8, 6, 4, 3, 2 and 1 points. The 8 best in each class (GT1 & GT2 in FIA GT, LMP1 & LMP2 in LMS) are the selected cars. I explain it with a concrete example for LMS cars. It's not the definitive choice since only 2 of the 5 rounds are already contested up to know. The 8 (provisionally) selected LMP1 cars and 8 (provisionally) selected LMP2 cars are in bold face. At our knowledge there exists no model of the Lola B05/60. The two last LMP2 cars could be replaced by the #32 and #41 Zytek 07S Zytek. [JPVR]
car Monza Barcelona Spa Ring Silverstone pts
#7 Peugeot 908 Hdi-FAP 20 8 15 20 - - - - - - 63 pts
#8 Peugeot 908 Hdi-FAP 3 20 20 15 - - - - - - 58 pts
#2 Audi R10 TDI 15 15 8 10 - - - - - - 48 pts
#1 Audi R10 TDI 8 6 15 15 - - - - - - 44 pts
#10 Lola B08/60 Aston-Martin 12 3 10 8 - - - - - - 33 pts
#17 Pescarolo-Judd P1 6 12 2 0 - - - - - - 20 pts
#16 Pescarolo-Judd P1 10 0 4 2 - - - - - - 16 pts
#6 Oreca Courage LC70 Judd 0 0 6 6 - - - - - - 12 pts
#15 Creation CA07 Aim 0 10 - - - - - - - - 10 pts
#18 Pescarolo-Judd P1 3 3 1 0 - - - - - - 7 pts
#14 Creation CA07 Aim 0 0 3 4 - - - - - - 7 pts
#5 Oreca Courage LC70 Judd 0 1 0 3 - - - - - - 4 pts
#19 Chamberlain Lola B05/60 2 0 0 0 - - - - - - 2 pts
#20 Epsilon Euskadi Judd 1 0 0 1 - - - - - - 2 pts
#34 Porsche RS Spyder 20 15 20 20 - - - - - - 75 pts
#31 Porsche RS Spyder 12 20 10 12 - - - - - - 54 pts
#27 Porsche RS Spyder 6 12 12 15 - - - - - - 45 pts
#33 Lola B08/60 Judd Coupe 15 2 15 10 - - - - - - 42 pts
#25 Lola MG EX265 10 10 2 6 - - - - - - 28 pts
#35 Saulnier Pescarolo Judd 8 8 0 2 - - - - - - 18 pts
#40 Quifel Lola B05/60 AER 2 4 8 3 - - - - - - 17 pts
#44 Kruse Lola B05/60 Mazda 0 6 3 0 - - - - - - 9 pts
#41 Zytek 07S Zytek 3 0 0 4 - - - - - - 7 pts
#26 Radical R9 AER 4 0 0 0 - - - - - - 4 pts
#45 WF01 Zytek 3 0 4 0 - - - - - - 4 pts
#46 WF01 Zytek 1 0 1 1 - - - - - - 3 ps
#37 WR Zytek 1 0 0 0 - - - - - - 1 pt


EEC #2 WAS A FINE RACE BUT OTHER TRACK WANTED

On track calls, on the PS motor, on Dutch criticism and on loosing € 6,500

April 2, 2008 - One week before the start of the Brussels 24 hours, Tamar Nelwan asked Nick de Wachter, to publish an article warning all entrants that a track in extremely poor condition - hardly driveable - was waiting them at Merlijn. Tamar even went a step further when he told me that, if he had the power of Bernie Ecclestone, he should have simply cancelled the race. What hurts me in this is that typical Dutch feeling of superiority, based upon an extreme sense for perfectionism. Sure, the track was not perfect, but despite that we all witnessed a fine race and a pretty good organisation. Raymond van Campenhout and his guys were extremely helpful, catering was good, and there was an independent race direction being present during 48 non interrupted hours. After the race I heard nothing than positive reactions, even by such racers as Fola Osu, Günther Riehl, Chris Bunenberg, Michael von Bernhem or Oscar Hernandez, who all had bad luck at the EEC #2. The lonely ones complaining as old wives were the Dutch: their cars were ruined, the race direction was not good (true: we took no time to do the control with the weight calculator - it will NOT happen again, promised), the braids of the track were a disaster and Merlijn was an experience which should no more be renewed. At one point the Dutch were absolutely right: the track was a disaster for more than half of the entered cars. It's a body killer in model car racing. On the other side the Merlijn track is a technical one, awarding superior racers, especially in the S-part following the straight. I only saw four racers going faster than all others through that part of the track: Michael Niemas, Kai Kivekäs, Willem Kloppenburg and Fola Osu (when his car was still alive). The problems with the outer lane - the body destryer - were perhaps not at the dimension as predicted in the article by Nick de Wachter, but if the Brussels 24 hours are to be maintained on the 2009 calendar, Merlijn should use for the 2009 edition the MTT track instead of Willy Heerweg's.

ON TRACK CALLS - At the EEC #2 there were countless track calls, just as it was at the 2002 Ostend Worlds on the track of Salvatore Noviello. Most of those track calls were absolutely illegal. The rule book states that track calls are only allowed for unmarshable cars (e.g. on deslotting in the pit lane, in front of the racers), when a debris is in the slot and when two or more cars are in the same slot. For a race director it's not possible to watch at any second all what's going on, on the complete track. The worst case is when two cars are together in the same slot. Here racers have to call "Double!" Then the race director knows that he has to cut the power immediately. Model car racers, however, use the word "Track!" also in cases of a double. As a race director you want to see first what happens, before you cut the power. [Of course you can act immediately on all "Tracks!", just as if it were "Doubles" and sanction after all illegal ones. But then one ends in endless discussions if the call was legal or not.] Looking if a track call was legal or not takes a second or so. I thus COMPLETELY disagree with what Remco van Waaij wrote on track calls. By refusing to use the word "Double!" power is not cut immediately in cases of a double. When three or four cars deslot at the same moment, that's not a legal track call. The cars are still marshable. So the two track calls by Remco van Waaij at the end of the race, in cases of multiple deslotting, were NO legal calls. Moreover I witnessed the most crazy track calls. Summit was a guy going too fast in one of the curbs,, seeing that probably his car will make a roll-over, shouting already "Track!", and then seeing that his car made it ... without deslotting. And that without any other car hanging around!!!  At the Woirlds all illegal track calls will, simply be ignored. That's the lonely way to learn racers how to behave on imaginary track call situations.

 

ON PROSLOT'S PS4000-IMCA MOTORS - Most racers were unhappy with the received handout motors. Their indignation was only partly justified. What absolutely was true that the shaft was cut on the pinion side and that this was poorly done by one of the ProSlot employees. That caused abnormal spinning with the pinion. Especially the cars of Afolabi Fola, Chris Bunenberg, Dirk Baele and Oscar Hernandez suffered from that poorly cutting of the shaft. As great sportsmen they never openly complained about this but did their race as real pros.
On the other side, that seven or eight motors came back, with a blocked armature was certainly not ProSlot's fault, but that of the racers themselves. Everybody, being long enough in slot-racing, knows that model car racers are absolutely no motorists. How could they be, after having raced during their whole life with lady shave motors (like the Fox) or with heavy tank motors (like the Bison). The mistake they make times by times is that they use the gear press incorrectly on posing the pinion. That provokes a lot of end to end play, or, in the worst case, a completely blocked armature. I even saw one racer using a hammer to put his pinion, and then complaining that his received motor worked improperly! For those abuse of motors, ProSlot is certainly not to be blamed. Much trouble could be avoided if the PS motors were delivered with the pinion already on the shaft. So no motors will be any longer destroyed by former lady shave motor racers. 
At Merlijn some motors didn't work properly due to the fact of recessed braids. Some racers forgot to adjust their guide and braids. Under such circumstances motors cannot get the potential power. 
Of course the PS4000-IMCA is no shit motor - I apologise having written such stupidity after 72 hours without sleep - but it can be improved in several ways.
(1) The can is not thick enough. I understand that this was done to reach the extremely low weight as on the Fox motors. A heavier can is wanted, even if this increases the weight of the motor.
(2) As long as there is no sealed version of the PS4000-IMCA it's not the ideal handout motor. Now an unbelievable lot of time is wasted by letting the handout motors being fixed to the chassis under eyes of the race direction. At the Barcelona Worlds it took more than four full hours for 42 motors. At Merlijn it took two hours for only 19 motors. I cannot organise a decent world championship in July if I need four hours or more to let 64 motors being fixed to the chassis. Without perfectly sealed motors, which can be handout when racers come to register, too much valuable time is lost. That is not the case if we work with the closed Bison Mk3 motor. So I decided to use the Bison for the sprint races with the Ferraris F430 and to maintain the PS4000-IMCA for the Endurance Worlds. I don't know if Dan Debella can deliver in time 120 PERFECTLY SEALED PS-4000 motors. Only if we receive such sealed motors early July we can drop the Bison Mk3 for the sprint races.
(3) PS4000-IMCA motors should arrive with a properly cut shaft and with a 9T steel pinion already soldered to that shaft.

HOW IT FEELS TO LOOSE € 6,500 SPONSORING MONEY - The last years I try to be as open as possible on my sponsoring deals. All racers who subscribed for the EEC 2008 perfectly new what was the deal: finding the 24 cars having dominated the 2007 Spa 24 hours, at scale 1/24th at the start of the three EEC rounds. At Badet Raceway - round #1 - the goal was reached. But at Merlijn some of the most important cars - among them the 2007 Spa winner - were absent. Francesc Reyes didn't show, Hugo Dekker mailed 14 days before the race that he couldn't show, Blondiau & Kühn could enter their PSI Corvette but refused to do so, André Colson was not present with the Motorola Ferrari F430 GT2, there was no SRT Corvette #18, etc. Racers who didn't show knew perfectly that this could cost IMCA the € 6,500 sponsoring money. They behaved as pure little egoists, not thinking on the financial consequences of their late withdrawal. They are not like Pål Hanson: he was unable to show but found two substitute drivers (Mark Sander & Henrik Hasager) to drive his #36 Aston Martin DBR9. That was what Reyes, Dekker, Colson & Cie had to do. All we can do now is hoping that the EEC #3 at Alsdorf will be such a success that we perhaps will not loose all the sponsoring money. There the 24 cars will be at the start: the #6 Corvette C6R will be driven by Willem Kloppenberg/Ronald Zaal, the #4 Belgian Corvette C5R will be present with Onno Griepink (THE revelation at Merlijn!) and it's still looking who will replace the Dekkers on the #98 Porsche 997 and wqho Colson on the #51 Motorola Ferrari.

 


NEW FORMAT 2008 ENDURO WORLDS -
I hate loosing money by the fault of others. Since it's far from certain that I can recuperate after Alsdorf the lost € 6,500, I immediately started an attempt to find new sponsoring money among the sponsors of the 2008 FIA GT cars. That new search after other sponsoring will cost me at least one or two months. A direct consequence was that I had to change the format of the 2008 ENDURO WORLDS since we have to race now FIA GT cars in 2008 specs. In order to avoid that racers should have troubles with the new cars, I decided that the GT2 racers will all receive a professional RTR body (made by Al Paterson and Nick de Wachter). For the GT1 racers Fola Osu can maintain his Jetalliance Aston DBR9, Borge Haug bought already the Maserati MC12 of Nick de Wachter, Ralph Seif will receive a RTR #3 Corvette and the Slovaks will receive a RTR #4 Saleen (both made by Al Paterson). So only four new Corvettes have to be built by those guys who already subscribed with that specific cars for the 2009 Toronto Worlds.

WHAT IS MAINTAINED FOR THE 2008 ENDURO WORLDS?
(1)
Article 7 of the Rule Book, as used at the EEC will be maintained, also the application of the weight calculator. This time control will effectively be done by Bob Demeyer, but WITHOUT racers "helping" at the race director's stand. We are big enough to need no helpers. Never more situations as in Barcelona 2006.
(2)
Of course we'll maintain the PS4000-IMCA handout motor, even if not available in sealed form.
(3)
We maintain the obliged tyre change at mid-race.

WHAT WILL BE CHANGED FOR THE 2008 ENDURO WORLDS?
(1) Only 16 cars (8 GT1 and 8 GT2) instead of 24.
(2) Three drivers per car instead of two.
(3) FIA GT bodies 2008 instead of 2007.
(4) Twice 12 hours non interrupted racing with night section as third 8 x 30' section.
[JPVR]


NEED FOR EXPERIMENTAL MODEL CAR CHASSIS IS HIGH

EEC Model Car Chassis Rules are actually beyond efficient control

 

March 8, 2008 - Model car racing is actually completely dominated by the PlaFit SLP chassis. Domination is so complete that reaching a podium in serious international racing seems impossible without using an SLP chassis. Other chassis manufacturers such as MoMo, Schoeler, Metris, M-Racing C1 and Slotvision don't succeed in launching a chassis having serious chances to beat the SLP chassis. It's not good that one specific chassis dominates all others, because it hurts technological development. There exist enough model car racers being clever enough to develop a personal experimental chassis. Here I think on Afolabi Osu, Nick de Wachter, Jozef Miskolci, Michael Niemas and so many others. As long as they are not allowed to enter a personal chassis the SLP domination will continue.
My viewpoint is that if we allow personal controllers we should allow personal chassis too. I think there is a possible way out, nl. to allow the use of experimental chassis at the six warm-up rounds of the 20th IMCA World Championship Sprint. It could be a first evaluation of the experiment. At the 20th IMCA Model Car World Championship itself we'll continue with the old rule that only mass manufactured homologated chassis can be allowed. It are all the chassis which one finds at our items page. If the use of experimental chassis at the warm-up races is a success we can definitively change the chassis rule for sprint races by putting that chassis is free. Then it will be up to Tamar Nelwan & Cie to decide if the rule of a free chassis can yes or no be introduced for the EEC 2009 and for the 2009 Endurance World Championship.
Introducing free chassis will make scrutineering much more easily. Now it's impossible to find someone who can control efficiently if the EEC 2008 chassis rules are expected or not. There exists so many parts that the EEC chassis rule is effectively beyond control. Unlike in G7 and G27 wing car racing (where the chassis is hardly more than one piece) and in ES24 (where number of pieces of a chassis is low), actual mass manufactured chassis count so many pieces that nobody can control if the rule that all chassis parts (except for a limited list of parts) are all of the same make. That "same make" principle holds only for EEC rounds and for the 2008 Endurance World Championship, not for the races with the Ferraris F430 Challenge, where technical control is much easier. Especially the fact that most manufacturers launch more and more replacement pieces for their own standard chassis makes the "same make" principle beyond control. Let's be honest: contrarily to USRA/ESROC wing car racing and ISRA scale racing, model car racing is still not mature. Only by allowing a free chassis (and clear rules concerning body, weight, dimensions and gearing) the way to adulthood can be found. Let's work all together on it. [JPVR]


CAN WE ALLOW TRACTION CONTROL IN SLOT-RACING?

Quid if we use at the Worlds the Revolutionary ACD controller?  No obligation!

February 29, 2008 - Since 2005 there is a controller on the market for all types of slotcars - the ACD Pro - allowing better braking and better use of power by introducing of the PWM system (Pulse Wide Modulation). Rumours that it should be possible to increase the voltage by using such controller are absolutely false: only on braking the used power unit of the track receives increased pulses. In other words: the increase of the voltage is not used to go faster, but used to brake better. To understand this one should keep in mind that it concerns an electronic controller, using no resistor as in mechanical controllers. On electronic controllers the trigger/wiper works on induction. The ACD Pro allows thus regenerative braking i.e. allows to brake later than on using a mechanic controller. 
As soon as the trigger is released on the average electronic controller the induction voltage in the motor has no way out so that the motor brakes. Thanks to the PWM system the motor functions better, as well on braking as on acceleration. Indeed, As soon as the trigger of the ACD Pro is released a bit the in the motor induced voltage goes back to the power unit (receiving induction pulses). The slightest reduce of speed results in much better braking than with other electronic controllers. Braking is much more equal. On the other side acceleration is also more equal so that slipping of the rear tyres (only frequent with ES24, G12, G27 and G7 cars) is lower.  

 

 

It has been written more than once that the use of the ACD Pro controller causes deficiencies on the power unit used by the track owner. Never a full proof of this was received. More interesting is the question of heating motors. PWM system implies that the motors receive more pulses so that the heat of the motor risks to increase. It remains an open question if such increase of heat is significant or not. Following Raymond van Campenhout, having done some tests with the ADL Pro 5 Amp and the new Proslot Euro Pro motor, the increase of heat on using the PWM system is negligible.
Some first conclusions. (1) It's bull shit that the ACD Pro increases the power. If there are verified power peaks it's only on BRAKING. There is no increase of speed as compared with any other controller. (2) If cars driven with an ACD controller go faster around it's not a question of voltage, but a question of better and more equal braking and better or more equal acceleration. There can thus be no reason to ban the ACD Pro from IMCA racing. Some argued such ban by telling that using ACD Pro Controllers is using traction control. I fully agree that we should forbid traction control but I follow Philippe Laudet for 100 per cent that the PWM system is no system of traction control, certainly not for model cars. So, let ACD controllers being allowed (just as at the DPM since 2006).

The ACD Pro exists in several versions and can be used by all voltages in the range of 7 thru 22 Volt. The ACD Pro 3 Amp can be used on racing lady shave motors such as the Fox II. The 5 Amp seems appropriated for motors as the ProSlot Euro Mk1, the Bison Mk3, the ProSlot Euro Pro (as raced this year at all IMCA races), etc. The 10 and 12 Amp seem to be enough for Group 12 racing (with or without wings). For G27 and G7 there exists the 30 Amp. The ACD Pro is a product of Yatronic Germany, specialised in the production of robots. Inventor is engineer Bassem Yahya. The controller uses the body of the Russkit controller (1965), later adopted by Parma. Weight of the controller is 120 gram for the 3 Amp, 105 gram for the other versions. Those other versions use a separate unit (kind of small black box). The ACD Pro is equipped with two knops. The red cap regulates the break, the black cap regalates the sensitivity. The cock between the two caps regulates the use of power. There is a switch for positive and negative wiring and a switch to change the trigger characteristic. Price of a ACD controller oscillates between 169 and 210 euro, exclusive packaging and shipping costs. The controller can be bought directly from engineer Bassem Yahya. Phone + 49 2431 6444. E-mail address: acdpro@yatronic.com. Web site: http://www.yatronic.de/. For most model car racers the ACD Pro 5 seems to be the ultimate controller. The caused problem is not one of traction control, but a social problem among "haves" and "haves not".

 
 

The high price of the ACD Pro inspired some racers ("haves not") to require the re-introduction of fixed controllers. IMCA used this system from 1994 thru 2006. There can be no question to use this system again. I follow the argument that a slot-race controller is like a toothbrush which you lend oinly to your best friend. In the past there were too much problems with controllers fixed to the track. Some of those problems were real, others - most frequently - were pure emotional (remember the painful Klinge episode in Barcelona). Since I am since more than a half century strongly opposed against social discrepancy I propose the following solution for the Worlds and for Zolder: IMCA will buy 12 ACD Pro 5 Amp controllers which can be used by any racer who wants so. After each run the controllers should come back to the race direction stand. Let this close the discussion among the "haves" and "haves not". At IMCA racing we always tried to obtain the most fair race conditions for ALL entrants. By ensuring free use (i.e. at no extra costs) of the best controller on the market, there is no longer any reason to insist that we should go back in time by returning to fixed controllers on the track. [JPVR]


STEPHAN WIESEL TROPHY TO BE CANCELLED

Another 3 months of hard work & fund raising for another fucking nothing!

February 16, 2008 - I was seven years old when my little brother of five died under my eyes, having been knocked down by a truck. It happened in 1952 a narrow street in Bruges: the Sulferbergstraat. Never more in my life, and that since 56 years, I put one foot in that street. If you love someone you do what you can to avoid the confrontation with the place where the beloved person died. Among the Amish of North-Germany they have another opinion on this - just like they have another opinion on everything than normal people have. In December they witnessed a real drama when suddenly Stephan Wiesel died when he was racing on their Mickey Mouse wooden five-laner. Normal people should - out of respect for Stephan - have replaced their Mickey Mouse track by something else, in order to avoid the dramatic confrontation with the past. But not the Amish. Now at once they wish to organise by the end of December 2008 a Memorial Race for Stephan, at exactly the same place where ... he died, exactly the same track where he died. As if this not enough they let even enter one of their best racers, suffering from a heart disease, just as if you are Amish, you have not to learn from your mistakes.
Now that the Amish wish to organise a Stephan Wiesel Trophy - they needed three full months to decide, and even after three months they are not sure (I needed three seconds after Fola told me what happened) - we cannot organise our own commemoration race. It's a bare fact that Stephan was much closer to the Amish than to us, so that it should be a proof of poor taste if we should insist to have at the same time our Wiesel Trophy. In their opinion it's "their Stephan" and strangers have no right to commemorate him somewhere else than in Amishland..

 

I sent a mail to the leader of the Amish clan to ask him if yes or no the Amish Wiesel Trophy will go on. Until now I received no answer. But we cannot wait for ever on their decision. Our racers should know if they need to buy the Group 5 and Group 4 cars for the IMCA Wiesel XMas Trophy. So I think that we have no other choice than to cancel our race, out of respect for Stephan.
The problem with the Amish is that their leader is a man without brains, set in his ways, refusing any other contact with the international community of slot-racers (except if he can do some crude commerce with them). Not the Amish have to come to the rest of the world, no, the rest of the world has to come to Amishland. I think that in respect for Stephan several international racers are intended to go to Amishland for their Stephan Wiesel Trophy. Then you expect that they'll respect the common international rules, that there will be a handout of rear tyres, a handout of competitive motors instead of lady shave motors, that ranking will be done on achieved laps, not including concourse points. Nothing of that all. In Amishland they ignore hospitality. As simple-minded peasants they oblige you to respect their strange DSC rules (not inspired by the love of the sport, but inspired by crude commercial interests).
I am involved since more than a half century in slot-racing. But never I met such a stubborn person as the Amish leader. Together with the most of us I believe that in a normal world one should lock up such person in a special clinic for mental diseases. But not in Amishland. So, let's decide to cancel the IMCA Wiesel Trophy and let's go to Amishland, but only out of respect fpr Stephan  [JPVR]


SORRY GERT, BUT IT'S SOMETIMES TOO MUCH

On the Amish organising their own Wiesel Trophy and on a missed sponsoring

February 16, 2008 - On Thursday evening I had a meeting with a potential Belgian auto sport sponsor. I was not very pleased with date and hour of the meeting on Valentine evening. Just before I received a mail from the Amish telling me that they were planning their own Stephan Wiesel Trophy at the same date as IMCA's. On the question if the entry fees of that meeting should go to Stephan's widow, I received no answer. All they could confirm that their Wiesel Trophy should go under DSC rules. I felt myself completely ridicule by their mail. In their eyes IMCA is good to collect entry fees for Stephan's widow, but none of them wishes to show to collect those fees, we have to bring it to Hamburg ourselves. So I was furious. What complete nutters are those Amish from North-Germany? They continue to refuse all racing under international rules. They made their own rulebook. Their DSC is hardly something else than a coalition of slot-race retailers looking at the first place at fresh income at any race they organise. Promotion of the sport is the smallest of their goals. All what they do is inspired by self-protection. In December I proposed them to offer for free an MTT track if they could continue after 2008 the Stephan Wiesel Trophy on an international track instead of on their small Mickey Mouse 5-laner. But even that was "'too international" for them.   
So I was not in my best shape when on Thursday evening I went to the meeting with a potential sponsor. Instead of starting immediately the negotiations, they preferred to diner together in a classy restaurant they already reserved for the evening. We drunk too much wine and when the real negotiations started everybody was already tipsy. At a given moment one of the guys objected that I was the wrong man to negotiate with, that he knew from SRO that I was only a minor pinion within IMCA, that the FIA GT race at the Worlds was a creation by the Dutch. I believed to die when I heart such nonsense. The iend of the meeting was that they all three disappeared without paying the bill, and that I could pay more than 500 euros. Needless to tell that I was really pissed off on leaving the restaurant.

 

Back home - and still furious - I found on my PC a mail by Gert Klinge, explaining me that he acted in perfect co-ordination with Tamar Nelwan. For me it was enough to explode. I was not aware of their contacts with the FIA GT PR in Lausanne. Nobody told me anything. At once I had so enough of anything that I wrote a furious mail to Gert and that I decided to stop any further effort to get the 20th IMCA Worlds financed. When I awake around noon I realised that it was wrong to attack the poor Gert Klinge who acted with the best intentions. So, sorry Gert. Nevertheless let's be clear upon those things. If IMCA is a ship, I am still the captain of that ship, waiting that Mark Campbell takes over the commandment by the end of 2008. A captain need to be always informed about what's going on on his ship. That's the only way to avoid misunderstandings. Since nobody had informed me about the steps of Gert I heart it from the SRO guys themselves. That gave the impression that I had no control over IMCA, that several decisions were token behind my back. So such a thing should not happen once more. Contacts with the press are too important to let them in hands of non-professionals, how good their intentions may be.  That's why I decided that all reports sent to SRO should go over Tamar Nelwan, so that we can control the texts.
There can be no question to send them long reports on what is for them only a marginal happening. I am a professional journalist and an experienced author, so I wish to check at least what type of info we are distributing.
Meanwhile I sent Gert a mail to apologise for my drunk behaviour. I am working since more than a quarter century to promote slot-racing. Year after year I take serious financial risks on organising the Worlds, because it's never sure if your sponsors will, yes or no, pay the convened sponsoring money. Let one thing be clear: Unlike DSC, IMCA never had the smallest commercial interests. We have NOTHING to sell except fun and international friendship. And that, at least, should be respected by all of us. If IMCA wishes to survive, it will only be if we act as ONE GROUP, not as a bunch of too big egos.  [JPVR]


ENTHUSIASM IS GOOD BUT NEEDS TO HAVE LIMITS

We still negotiate to have a model car demonstration race at Spa, but please don't negotiate yourselves in my name!!! You're killing all my efforts on doing so.

February 14, 2008 - On the unofficial IMCA web site I read reactions to go with the IMCA Worlds to the Spa circuit, just like it should be IMCA's due. Persons putting such threads on the site are asking not one single second what this will cost. they behave as if IMCA is rich enough to pay anything. Yes, I am still negotiating to bring the MTT track over to Spa during the Total 24 hours race, but not to do the Worlds on it!. My plan is to invite the 8 best model car racers together with 8 FIA GT 1/1 racers and 8 journalists for a short race over 8 x 5 minutes with 8 cars shared each by a model car racer (doing half of the stints), a journalist (doing 2 stints) and a FIA GT racer (doing 2 stints). That's the best thinkable publicity for model car racers.  Actually I negotiate with Publiaplic (of the pagoda and the lettering on FIA GT cars) to materialise that project. But what happens? Some of our friends turned out completely nuts after they saw that the EEC 2008 is on SRO's web site. One of those enthusiasts even negotiated behind my back with officials of the Spa circuit. € 50,000 to bring the Worlds to Spa was no problem for him: "Mr. Van Rossem will pay you without the smallest problem." This stupidities should absolutely stop. Where we go if a guy without track, without income, without organising experience feels it useful to negotiate in my name. First of all IMCA GOES NOT TO SPA WITH THE 20TH WORLDS. Secundo IMCA will NOT PAY FOR A DEMONSTATION RACE AT SPA (such must be financed by sponsors). Tertio one should be crazy to believe that IMCA SHOULD PAY 50,000 EUROS FOR SOMETHING.
Another point concerns the publication on the SRO web site. It was my intention to bring the Endurance Worlds and the three rounds of the EEC 2008 on the FIA GT web site, but in this I was passed by Gert Klinge who contacted SRO on his own. This was a good initiative, but much better should have been if there should have been any co-ordination. I explain.

 

(1) In 1985 the Pinky Point series was regularly in the autosport press. In those days IMCA's PR was done (extremely well) by Philippe de Cock. At a given moment, blinded by this success several racers sent own articles to the press, beyond IMCA's control, News in those articles was so subjective that most magazines stopped publication.
(2) In 1989 I was involved in F1 with my Onyx team. At several Grand Prix - e.g. in the States - we had an own slot-race track where, on Wednesday and Thursday before the race we organised races with a couple of slot racers and several F1 racers. When some of those races for fun came on TV some racers found it their due to send all kind of letters to TV stations, resulting in the fact that the emission were stopped.
(3) In 1995 our competition with 1/24th Nascar cars came regularly in the autosport press and once more things went wrong when all kind of racers started sending reports (mostly in poor English or poor French) to the press, ending in a clear stop of articles.
I don't wish that once more things go wrong, due to over-enthusiast racers. So let's respect a clear rule: if you have an article on the EEC 2008 send it to Tamar Nelwan who can co-ordinate everything. If you have some article on the upcoming Endurance Worlds, send it to me for co-ordination.  Here you find the text of our first bulletin to the FIA GT.
A last word why the 20th IMCA Worlds will stay in Mechelen instead of going to Spa. Irrespective of the extremely high costs to go with 86 racers to Spa (cost nearly 500 euro per racer!) there is the problem to find hotel rooms at an affordable price. It's not possible to let pay entrants €120 per night or more. Apart from that there are traffic problems to reach in time, day after day, the race location. So, don't dream of what is impossible. The 2008 Worlds go to Mechelen, not to Spa. [JPVR]


IMCA'S EEC 2008 ON OFFICIAL FIA GT WEB SITE

Barnburner USA: Is G7 Racing dying? Only 6 entrants at 18th edition

February 12, 2008 - This afternoon I informed Tamar Nelwan that his EEC 2008 is now on the official FIA GT web site of SRO. Gert Klinge was the first to contact SRO. They accepted nearly immediately to bring the news of the Oslo 12 hours on their web site. Since the 2008 Endurance Worlds will go exclusively with FIA GT cars, seen at the 2007 Total Spa 24 hours, a full report on that event may be expected at their site too, with complete results. Since this is my last year as organiser of international slot-racing events I promised earlier this year that in 2008 we should again invite the international press at our major 2008 event. It's important that racers realise to maintain the link between autosport and slot-racing as close as possible if we wish to promote our hobby sport. The short article on the Oslo 12 hours can be found at http://www.fiagt.com/newsitem.php?key=1468. An official presentation of the 2008 Endurance World Championship can be found here. It will be sent to the international press. Never before - even not in the golden sixties - the link between autosport and slot-racing has been as close than now. I wish to thank Tamar Nelwan and all involved racers that they succeeded to realise my idea of a perfect model car version of the 2007 Total Spa 24 hours.

 

In one type of slot-racing the link between autosport and slot-racing completely disappea-red: in wing car racing. Especially G7 racing, once the F& class in slot-racing, is going wrong. At this week-end's 18th Barnburner only six racers showed for the G7 Pro race. The race was won by Paul "Beuf" Pedersen (USA), ahead over Joe "Chubby" Salzman (USA), Brad Friesner (CDN), Bill Skinner II (USA), Less Wright (USA) and "Gugu" Bernardino (BR). Never earlier at the Barnburner attendance at the main event was that low. But tell me, who else on the American continent is able to beat those magnificent six? Number of potential winners in American G7 racing is so low that more and more wing car racers retire from what was always the top of the bill in international slot-racing. Where are the days where we found 125 entrants as at the 1978 wing car worlds? In Europe, apart from the Scandinavian countries, things go hardly better. I offered my brand new Blue King for free to a dozen of clubs, under the condition that they start up a real wing car school, where young racers are learned how to build a competitive wing car. However absolutely nobody was interested. But if we wish to avoid that the noble G7 racing is definitively dying we should start initiation centres. Otherwise Mario Schöne, Vlado Okali and Juha Yli-Sipola vwill still win in ...2040!


 

OPEN LETTER BY MARK CAMPBELL

IMCA membership card necessary if one wishes to continue the Worlds

Hello Friends,

We are all aware that this is Jean Pierre’s last year to lead IMCA.  Yes, the words have been heard before in the context of slot racing rhetoric and I am sure his own frustration at times with the the many personalities of this hobby, however we all know that the words we hear today are sincere.  And they are the words of a most sincere man.  There will be time when we are all together, new friends and old friends, glasses in hand to celebrate JPvR’s many achievements and a contribution to the world of slot racing that is without equal.  As a new face at IMCA, there are many others that should begin the celebration and it is not my intent to start that tribute with this letter.  

I would like to begin the thinking.  What is the value of IMCA to each of us?  Is IMCA only to exist because of the philanthropy and financial generosity of JPvR?  This would be a very poor tribute to the man who has given us so much of his life and hard work.  I would use stronger words and say that it would put shame on all of us.  Are we willing to leave the apron strings and to take responsibility for the future?  Are we willing to accept the hard work?  And most importantly, are we willing to accept the financial responsibility?  Nothing in this world comes for free as we all know, and we must accept that the friendships that we have formed, the great racing, the international fraternity, it all comes with a price . . . and a price worth paying.

We will all come together in July of this year for the 2008 WORLDS in the beautiful city of Mechelen, once again at the hands, the hard work and the financial commitment of our good friend Jean Pierre van Rossem.  As we start to build our cars for another championship, each of us should also begin to build our thoughts for the future of IMCA.  To come to Mechelen not only prepared to race, but also prepared to discuss the future and prepared to make whatever personal commitment is within our reach.  In a relatively short time I have come to know the IMCA family, a truly wonderful group of people with tremendous diversity, skill, talent and humanity.  The greatest tribute we can pay to JPvR in this year is to demonstrate that we can stand on our own two feet and continue the great international fraternity of racing that he has given to us.

Mark Campbell
Toronto

 

everybody knows I stop all my slot-race activities at the end of this year. I think that Mark Campbell is the correct person to continue IMCA once I am no longer involved. What should be continued in any case is the IMCA World Championship plus annex the Franco Gianotti Trophy. Since 1985 IMCA organised always a representative world championship with racers from all continents (except Asia. We installed a tradition to cover part of the travelling costs of racers coming from overseas. That, however, will be impossible if we go overseas with the Worlds (like we already did in 1988, 1989 and 1991). Fortunately most European racers are wealthy enough that they can pay a plane ticket to the 2009 Toronto Worlds. But racers from South-Africa, from Australia, from New Zealand, from Brazil have not all enough income to pay their plane ticket. If we wish to maintain the Worlds after 2009 we must find a way to cover the costs. Sponsoring is a magic word, but I am fully aware that I am the lonely person in slot-racing having succeeded year after year obtaining decent sponsoring deals in cash money. That is thanks to the fact that I am a former F1 owner having had very good contacts with auto sport circles. Nobody else has those contacts, so we have to keep in mind that after my withdrawal all IMCA events will have to do without sponsoring income.
A decent and representative world championship costs at least € 17,500 (€ 10,000 for plane tickets, € 2,500 for the rent of a good location, € 1,000 on t-shirts, € 500 on insurances, € 500 on web sites, € 3,000 on additional costs for motors, tyres, race directors - there is only ONE Bob Demeyer doing it for free! - catering, etc.)
But how to cover € 17,500 without cash entry of sponsoring money? There is only one way out, nl. the introduction of a yearly IMCA membership card, sold at € 125.00. This year, e.g., 122 racers subscribed for one of the several IMCA events. Should we introduce an IMCA membership card, there should be a way to cover the costs of a world championship. Racers have to understand that after me nobody will be so crazy to advance the high sums to organise a decent world championship. Since no slot-racing manufacturers are interested to invest cash money in racing events, the money needed to organise such events has to come from the racers themselves. In my eyes the introduction of an IMCA membership card will be an absolute necessity to maintain the IMCA Worlds on the international calendar. Because once I have definitively retired from slot-racing NOBODY has to contact me to be any longer a fund raiser. I did it during a quarter century, but there are more funny things in live than to play the role of the eternal beggar. So after 31 December 2008 there will be no longer a JPVR as IMCA's fundraiser. [JPVR]


THINGS ARE NOT GOING LIKE THEY SHOULD GO

Ultimate ES24 still no success - Wiesel Trophy without Wiesel friends

January 26, 2008 - I took a 14 days break in order to write a new novel. The novel is finished and I am now negotiating with some editors in Holland and Belgian to see where I can get the best conditions. Those 14 days without slot-racing were for me a period to reload myself, because being honest, this last year is the year too much. I wish to do other things. There are moments that I have absolutely enough of slot-racing. I give one example. Two weeks ago I wired € 1000 to Beate Wiesel, the widow of Stephan. On doing so you expect that she at least will thank you. But perhaps that was too much asked. I have the feeling that I am just good to pump always money in slot-racing and that I am alone to do so. Take e.g. the 2008 IMCA Worlds. I budgeted total cost price on € 36,000, but sponsoring goes not as expected. Last year I got € 27,000 from Ferrari Challenge 1/1 racers, money which I used for the 2007 IMCA Worlds. I hoped to find at least € 30,000 from other racers. But that was a miscalculation. This year I got only € 9,000 from other racers. Attempts to get sponsoring from the American and Canadian Ferrari Challenge 1/1 racers completely failed. With them I never had the personal contacts I had always with the European racers. So I am € 27,000 short for the 2008 IMCA Worlds. And once more I am completely alone to find that money. Slot-racers never ask me if they can help. They find it totally normal that I do that job for them. As it was something due. 
Meanwhile things are not going as they should go. Take the Ultimate ES24 Race. Here European racers have a unique opportunity to compete with Paul Gawronski and Gustav Heymann in a splendid combat. But of Josef Korec, Vladimir Horky, Petr Krcil, Lasse Aberg, etc., nobody subscribes. So why to do more efforts that racers from Holland, Belgium and Germany should find their way back to scale racing in ISRA style? Or take the Stephan Wiesel X-Mas Trophy. Stephan's sudden death touched me deeply. I wished to do really something for his widow. The entry fees of that race have to go to her. But nobody of the Wiesel friends - no Dieter Jens, no Matthias Parke, no Gerd van de Wiel, no Pit Schwaar - let see the smallest interest to show. It's even too much for them to pick up the money of the entry fees. No, it's a due for Van Rossem to bring the money to Neumünster. This is completely crazy. And then one asks me: Why should you stop?
Fortunately not all things go wrong. Tamar Nelwan did a great job to launch the 2008 EEC next week at Oslo. Insurance was paid and the 24 FIA GT cars will be at the start. Meanwhile racers are already preparing their F430 for the 2008 Worlds. Fujimi bodies are available at Slotracing Werk at a reasonable price. Al Paterson and Fola Osu can help you with correct decals for those cars, should you have a decal problem. [JPVR]     

  Tony Ring's F430 Challenge as under construction in South-Africa. Al Paterson can make any decal for those cars at a fair price. Also Fola Osu knows how to make missing decals. Contact them if you have decal problems.


WHY THE MTT TRACK IS SO IMPORTANT?

THE MTT TRACK WAS USED IN 1987, 1989 & 2007 FOR FIVE OFFICIAL WORLDS

January 9, 2008 - Up to now the MTT track has been used three times for official world championships. The first time was Toulouse 1987 where both the ES32 Worlds and the ES GP12 Model Car Worlds were contested on the famous track designed by Michel Thoumieu (F). Twice superstar Sergio Maresca (I) was the winner, but twice he was disqualified for a too low ground clearance. Maresca's trick was his much higher speed in the Esses, just as Michel Thoumieu had predicted; Indeed, he was convinced that only great champions could win on his track, and that all the difference should be made in the Esses.
In 1989 an American MTT track (Dan Debella's) was made in view of the Chicago Worlds of that year, again for the ES32 Scale Worlds and for the ES GP12 Model Car Worlds. Just as two years earlier Maresca made twice the difference in the Esses, but now he was disqualified once at the Semis (in ES GP12) and once at the finish in ES32. In the first named race three top racers made the difference in the Esses: Jan Limpach, Dave Gick and Sergio Maresca. There was one obstinate Briton, not used to race without goop, but having a superior motor set-up, who lost each time 10 to 20 cm in the Esses but compensated it by a higher speed in the straight. His name? Georgie Kimber. He succeeded to keep up with the three super stars of that moment until the last segment. Then he had to let them go. Eventually Maresca won ahead over Limpach and Gick (but was disqualified later).
Much later, in 2007, it appeared that Thoumieu's prophecy turned again in being the full truth. Now only the young Philipp Kremer was able to pass the Esses at much higher speed than his direct opponents: Michael Niemas, Ralph Seif and Nick de Wachter. At the finish he had an advance of two laps over Niemas, seven over Seif and ten over De Wachter. [Notheworth is that ayt the Semis and at the Quarters only Jozef Miskolci and Ladislav Szalai succeeded to pass the Esses at high speed, but due to the fact that they raced an old PlaFit Excel, not an SLP, they didn't enjoy the SLP's camber effect, so that they had not enough acceleration in the lead on, where they had to brake a fraction of a second.]
Michel Thoumieu's track remains the fairest track in the world: it compensates the most talented racer. Curious to see who of Paul Gawronski, Vladimir Horky or Gustav Heymann will be the fastest in the Esses at the Ultimate ES24 race? Curious too who of Philipp Kremer or "Piki" will be the fastest in the same Esses at the 20th Model Car Worlds? Because one thing is granted: the man who can pass the Esses at the highest speed will also be the winner - something Michel Thoumieu predicted already ... twenty years ago! [JPVR]

BELOW: Original drawing for the 1989 American MTT Track, as a reproduction of the MTT track having been used at the 1987 scale & model car worlds in Toulouse. ES24 cars didn't exist already, but one raced ES32 and ES GP12. As well in Toulouse as in Chicago the supertalented Sergio Maresca won in both classes, but was ... four times disqualified for a (total unnecessary) too low clearance.

  ABOVE: The American MTT track as used at the 1989 Chicago Scale (ES32 & ES GP12) & Model Car Worlds. On the American version "the 180" came slightly over the straight.
BELOW: Brian Crosby's (Steve Ogilvie) MTT as used at the 2007 Model Car Worlds. "The 180" is again in original position as it was on the original MTT designed by the late Michel Thoumieu and Gérard Caupène in 1987 for the Scale (ES32 and ES GP12) Worlds and for the Model Car Worlds.


SPLENDID AUTO PORTRAIT BY A SPLENDID RACER

Georgie Kimber's farewell to international slotracing...

January 9, 2008 - There was one racer in the world who I liked as much as my sons, more than the super stars as Vladimir Horky, Josef Korec, Paul Pfeiffer, P-A Watson, Dave Gick, Paolo Trigiolio, Sergio Maresca, Salvatore Noviello; Jan Limpach or other Nick de Wachters. His name: Georgie Kimber. One of the most difficult moments in my slot-racing life was October 12, 2007. That day Georgie Kimber contested his real last race: ES24 at the ISRA Revuca Worlds. I felt my heart bleeding when I saw that such a superb racer, at the end of his long career, could only qualify as 108th on 112. I am sure that that provoked a deep pain in his pure soul. 
Sure, Georgie Kimber was not the best British racer. He was no Charlie Gooding, no Brian Saunders, no Steve Walker, no Dave Harvey, but when he had to defend his country on the international scene he grew up beyond his own talent. I remember very well Chicago 1989 where he was fighting until the last segment to become the ES32 Scale Racing World Champion. Of the British contingent he and Mark Harrison were the only Britons reaching the mean. There he had to fight with such super talents as Jan Limpach and Dave Gick. Until the real last segments he was the lonely of the other finalists to keep up with those two supermen. Only during the last minute he was passed by Clithio van Buggen-hout, missing the podium for a couple of inches. But he was the first Briton!
Georgie Kimber was a simple barber, modesty himself. But of all Britons he's the very lonely one having won two official world championships, in 2003 and in 2004, as best modeller of the world. I am convinced that nobody in England - where model car racing stayed unknown until today - has ever known that Georgie did so. After four decades of racing he stopped active racing. Racing without Georgie will never more be as it was. But I have a dream. As organiser of my real last race in 2008 (December 27-28), I dream that I'll see Georgie a real last time at the start. No organiser can receive a greater honour than saying: "I organised my last race and I had Georgie Kimber for the last time of his life at the start." I know that as a barber, the X-Mas days are for Georgie financially spoken highdays. But I wish to award all potential financial damages if I can see him a last time at the start. He deserves a warm ovation by all of us. Which honour can be greater for a racer than allowing him to tell his kids later: "I raced together with Georgie at his real last race..." [JPVR]

It is always hard to talk on the demise of a slotracer. This time no legend ,certainly no Maresca ,no Trigilio,no Walker,not even a Limpach or Gick . But Georgie Formula One Kimber can be finally laid to his rest, for in Revuca it was for sure his final walk. Since his start at Torino in 1980 he has always been streetfighting ,time & again he could rise to the highest Alps to victory lane. It was for certain that he could never count on the meagrest talents of a Horky or Saunders but he always carried his countries honour, Nine times out of ten he could not beat these slotracing Gods but as in Chicago he could prove his Lionheart, a true Englishman ,a man who could fight to the end ,even conjure up a miracle.

It could have been else for our Georgie, born on scrap heaps of Tyneside Shipbuilding in the neglected Industrial Wastelands of not so Great Britain. His only education was the streets but the chance sighting of racing cars in his local toy shop was to carve out his destiny. Time after time he could leave his sceptred Isle and embrace a culture far removed from the British Goop laden traditions of no lane changes and lonely Saloons. But how to change a nation so entrenched in their sticky traditions.
But Georgie could finally convince at the UES Euro Cup in Middlesborough that his country could make the move.
It was always his proudest moment to stage the 1993 ISRA championships in his native Northeast with Limpach,Gick and a young Horky showing for the future.

It was no disgrace in Revuca,perhaps self inflicted technical problems but after eight days of Pork scratchings andSheepsballs it was the end. No more venturing from these misty shores.
Time to hand over to the man who could save his country from the mediocrity . In Revuca Graeme Stephenson could show Britain has a future beyond a Saunders and a Cleave ,no one more fitting to carry on Georgies Legacy.

Time to say Goodbye, Time to take me to my slot racing Heaven and my Area Three Lexan Coffin. No more slotracing Darkside for my dear beloved wife. Thank you all,Thank you Jean Pierre. 
See you all in 2008 for my final dance .
Georgie Kimber. 21-10-07


MY THREE MAJOR DECEPTIONS OF 2007

1. No LM Race in Paris, 2. No Belgian Gr5 Support, 3. Wiesel 's Death & the Amish

January 1, 2008 - If you should ask me which event touched me the most in the past year, I should have a choice among many topics; there was the unexpected victory of Joe "Chubby" Salzman at the USRA G7 Nats; there was Vladimir Horky winning his sixth ES24 World Championship; and there was young Philipp Kremer dominating completely the 19th IMCA Worlds. But two events touched us all much more than that, nl. the fact that towards the end of the year the famous chassis builder Craig Landry passed away and - perhaps even more dramatic - that the founding father of model car racing Stephan Wiesel died from a heart attack just before XMas at a race in Hamburg. The fact that I had since 2005 a stupid controversy with Stephan, that I had the clear intention to talk it out, but that I waited too long to do it , was for me - UNDOUBTEDLY - the major deception of 2007. 
In chronological order it was my third major deception of the year. Much earlier I met my first big deception. Indeed, together with Tamar Nelwan and Yves Welter sr, I had the ambition to organise on the Paris' Champs Elysées, in front of the Peugeot showroom, a model car version of the 2007 Le Mans 24 hours and its fantastic struggle between Audi and Peugeot. Total cost of the event was budgeted at more than € 125,000 but contacts with several racing teams gave me the firm conviction that we should have found that sponsoring budget if Peugeot should have accepted to co-operate. After our first visit at the Peugeot show room there was good hope that we could succeed. But at my second visit at Paris it became obvious that the project was deemed to fail after Peugeot let us know that not earlier than March 2008 they could take a decision.
The Peugeot project was an ultimate attempt to free slot-racing from its completely marginalised position. We have to go back to the mid 1960s to have seen reports on slot-racing in prime time news editions on television. A model car version of the Peugeot-Audi combat at the Champs Elysées, shortly before the 2008 1/1 edition should have been prime time news. The failure of the project was also important for French slot-racing. Indeed, it's a bare fact that slot-racing is as well as death in France. Since 2000 no more French racers were seen in international competition outside France. What was left of the great era of the Thibaults, Didier Moret, Dominique Bellenger, Jean-Claude Ehinger, Philippe Point, Alain Clastres, Michel Thoumieu, Marc Joyeux, Gérard Caupène and so many others has been reduced to racing with plastic toy cars at 1/32nd. As long as Yves Welter sr organised the European Endurance 1/32nd Championship, there was still something. Now there is nothing left. Welter succeeded to find more than 24 French racers accepting to come to the Champs Elysées, but once it became sure that the project could not be materialised, they all withdrew. So the 20th IMCA Nats and the 23rd Scale Racing Worlds (the 17th organised by ISRA) will go once more without the smallest French racer. And yes, we'll bring the 20th IMCA Worlds of 2008 on the national television, but what's such emission is worth compared to prime time news on A2, FR3 or TSRF? It's just like you had good hope to drive the newest Ferrari, but that on the last day they come tell you that you'll receive to drive a 2CV. We worked really hard on the LM2007 project at the Champs Elysées, hundreds of hours, but unfortunately the result was nada, nothing.         

The second big deception followed on December 21, 2007. Since months I was working in silence on a model car racing project with the famous Group 5 cars of 1976-1981. In Belgium Raymond van Campenhout organises since 2006 a model car series for such cars at scale 1/24th. In 2007 no less than 68 racers entered that competition over 10 rounds. Mid 2007 Hubert Jacob and Nick de Wachter decided to organise a confrontation Belgium-Holland with Group 5 cars at Alsdorf in Germany. On December 1, no less than 36 racers showed, half from Belgium, half from Holland. For me that seemed a clear proof that it was possible to go internationally with such cars. More than one month before Stephan Wiesel passed away I had a clear project to organise such international competition around XMas 2008 as my definitive farewell from slot-racing. 
Then we received the sad news that Stephan Wiesel died in Hamburg during a DSC race. As soon as Afolabi Osu (NIG) informed me about the drama, I decided to call my very last organisation the Stephan Wiesel XMAS Trophy. I decided to organise two events, one just before XMas with 1978 DRM Group 5 cars, and one just after XMas with 1981 DRM Group 5 cars. I contacted Raymond van Campenhout and he too was convinced that the 1978 DRM session should be sold out from the real first day. Racers had to wait December 21 to subscribe. But number of Belgian entries for the 1978 edition was extremely low. Even after I send all Belgian entrants a personal e-mail, I came no further than ... 8 Belgian subscriptions. Such top specialists as Willy Heerwegh, George Baikry, Chantal Aerts, René "Lange", Alex Vandenbempt, Gilles and Patrice Dohohne, Grégoire Hans, Daniel Rasseneur, Patrick Frère, Robert Massart, André Colson, Fabrice van Dam, etc. showed not the smallest interest to go internationally. Very similar attitude of the Dutch Group 5 racers having been present at Alsdorf: Willem Kloppenburg, Remco van Waaij, Sergiu Houwer, Onno Griepink, Jurgen Rossenaar, Ronald Zaal, Erwin Post, André van der Zee, Tom Jacobs showed not the smallest interest. Belgium-Holland, O.K., but a confrontation with the rest of the world? No, thank you very well.

The death of Stefan Wiesel was a real shock for me. Model car racers hardly know how many parts they use in their model cars, were not manufactured by Stephan. All the lexan interiors used at the 19th IMCA Worlds were made by Stephan. Where Michael Gräber is specialised in manufacturing 1/24th scale models actual race cars, Stephan Wiesel was specialised in models of cars of the 1960s and the 1970s. In 2005, before our controversy, I asked him if he could bring out a decent version of the Lancia Beta Montecarlo, the BMW 320i Gr5, the BMW M1 Gr 5 and the Zakspeed Escort II DBA.
I found it my duty to set up a Stephan Wiesel Trophy, just as I did with the Franco Gianotti Trophy when Franco passed away. My plan was to bring the 32 best international racers together for a meeting over six races shortly after XMas 2008. Racers from 13 different countries - even from the USA and Canada - subscribed for this meeting, proving how popular Stephan was in the whole world. Other racers from South-Africa, New Zealand, Australia and Brazil wrote me that the date was difficult for them to show, but proved their fullest respect for Stephan. In one week time 28 of the 32 cars were chosen, but ... not one by the direct friends of Stephan himself.
Those friends belong to what commonly was called "Amishland" in slot-racing, I mean the racers from North-Germany. They themselves form a very closed community, hoping always that the rest of the world comes to Amishland to race with